On 30 August 2013, Dutch denim label G-Star Raw sued the Portuguese clothing company Cofemel, operator of the Tiffosi brand, alleging that Tiffosi garments infringed the copyright in G-Star’s clothing designs. The dispute concerned whether distinctive fashion products—rather than merely paintings, sculptures, or other traditional artistic works—could qualify for copyright protection under European law. After the case moved through the Portuguese courts, Portugal’s Supreme Court of Justice referred the legal question to the Court of Justice of the European Union in Luxembourg. The resulting Cofemel judgment, delivered on 12 September 2019 in Case C-683/17, became a major EU intellectual-property precedent: clothing designs and other applied-art objects can receive copyright protection when they are original intellectual creations, and national courts may not require an additional standard of artistic or aesthetic value. The ruling did not turn the dispute into a proven criminal counterfeiting operation, but it exposed the high-stakes legal conflict surrounding the copying of commercially successful denim silhouettes and clarified a rule that continues to affect fashion brands, designers, and fast-fashion companies across Europe.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 2010s
G-Star’s 2013 Copyright War Over Tiffosi Jeans That Reached Europe’s Highest Court
Tiffosi / Cofemel and G-Star Raw / 2010s
On 30 August 2013, Dutch denim label G-Star Raw sued the Portuguese clothing company Cofemel, operator of the Tiffosi brand, alleging that Tiffosi garments infringed the copyright in G-Star’s clothing designs. The dispute concerned whether distinctive fashion products—rather than merely paintings, sculptures, or other traditional artistic works—could qualify for copyright protection under European law. After the case moved through the Portuguese courts, Portugal’s Supreme Court of Justice referred the legal question to the Court of Justice of the European Union in Luxembourg. The resulting Cofemel judgment, delivered on 12 September 2019 in Case C-683/17, became a major EU intellectual-property precedent: clothing designs and other applied-art objects can receive copyright protection when they are original intellectual creations, and national courts may not require an additional standard of artistic or aesthetic value. The ruling did not turn the dispute into a proven criminal counterfeiting operation, but it exposed the high-stakes legal conflict surrounding the copying of commercially successful denim silhouettes and clarified a rule that continues to affect fashion brands, designers, and fast-fashion companies across Europe.
The daily editorial is currently unavailable. There’s still an entire archive to explore.