In October 2010, Marie Claire's U.S. website published a blog post by writer Maura Kelly titled "Should Fatties Get a Room?" The article attacked the portrayal of overweight characters kissing and having sex on television, particularly in the sitcom Mike & Molly. Kelly wrote that she would be "grossed out" watching two people with "rolls and rolls of fat" kiss and described seeing a very fat person walk across a room as "aesthetically displeasing." She also argued that obesity was largely within an individual's control. The post triggered an immediate online revolt, generating thousands of reader comments and coverage from CBS, The Today Show, Forbes, The Atlantic, and The Wall Street Journal. Kelly later apologized for upsetting readers and disclosed that she had previously been anorexic, suggesting that her own history with body image had shaped her extreme reaction. Marie Claire editor in chief Joanna Coles defended the article's author as a provocative blogger while emphasizing Kelly's past anorexia, but the episode exposed the tension between fashion media's beauty ideals and its increasingly scrutinized responsibility toward body diversity. By 2024, both the original post and its follow-up had disappeared from Kelly's Marie Claire archive, leaving the controversy as a notable case study in editorial judgment, digital backlash, and the institutional difficulty of addressing fat-phobic language in a major women's magazine.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 2010s
The 2010 Marie Claire Fat-Shaming Backlash That Turned a Lifestyle Blog into a National Scandal
Marie Claire and Maura Kelly / 2010s
In October 2010, Marie Claire's U.S. website published a blog post by writer Maura Kelly titled "Should Fatties Get a Room?" The article attacked the portrayal of overweight characters kissing and having sex on television, particularly in the sitcom Mike & Molly. Kelly wrote that she would be "grossed out" watching two people with "rolls and rolls of fat" kiss and described seeing a very fat person walk across a room as "aesthetically displeasing." She also argued that obesity was largely within an individual's control. The post triggered an immediate online revolt, generating thousands of reader comments and coverage from CBS, The Today Show, Forbes, The Atlantic, and The Wall Street Journal. Kelly later apologized for upsetting readers and disclosed that she had previously been anorexic, suggesting that her own history with body image had shaped her extreme reaction. Marie Claire editor in chief Joanna Coles defended the article's author as a provocative blogger while emphasizing Kelly's past anorexia, but the episode exposed the tension between fashion media's beauty ideals and its increasingly scrutinized responsibility toward body diversity. By 2024, both the original post and its follow-up had disappeared from Kelly's Marie Claire archive, leaving the controversy as a notable case study in editorial judgment, digital backlash, and the institutional difficulty of addressing fat-phobic language in a major women's magazine.
The daily editorial is currently unavailable. There’s still an entire archive to explore.
