Tom Ford carried his sexually charged Gucci and YSL image into his own brand, where several advertising campaigns triggered accusations of vulgarity, sexism, and the objectification of women. One advertisement showed a nude woman holding a perfume bottle between her legs; another depicted a naked woman ironing a man's trousers while he sat reading a newspaper, turning domestic labor and female nudity into a deliberately provocative luxury tableau. At least one advertisement was banned in Italy. Ford refused to retreat from the controversy, describing himself as an 'equal opportunity objectifier' and arguing that his use of male bodies—including the controversial nude M7 campaign at YSL—was intended to expose the unequal cultural standards governing male and female nudity. The dispute became part of Ford's broader public identity as the designer who made polished, expensive sexuality a core brand language. It also revealed the commercial paradox of such imagery: the campaigns generated attention and reinforced his reputation for erotic sophistication, while critics argued that the shock value depended disproportionately on presenting women's bodies as decorative objects.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 2000s-2010s
The Perfume Ads That Made Tom Ford Fashion's 'Equal-Opportunity Objectifier'
Tom Ford / 2000s-2010s
Tom Ford carried his sexually charged Gucci and YSL image into his own brand, where several advertising campaigns triggered accusations of vulgarity, sexism, and the objectification of women. One advertisement showed a nude woman holding a perfume bottle between her legs; another depicted a naked woman ironing a man's trousers while he sat reading a newspaper, turning domestic labor and female nudity into a deliberately provocative luxury tableau. At least one advertisement was banned in Italy. Ford refused to retreat from the controversy, describing himself as an 'equal opportunity objectifier' and arguing that his use of male bodies—including the controversial nude M7 campaign at YSL—was intended to expose the unequal cultural standards governing male and female nudity. The dispute became part of Ford's broader public identity as the designer who made polished, expensive sexuality a core brand language. It also revealed the commercial paradox of such imagery: the campaigns generated attention and reinforced his reputation for erotic sophistication, while critics argued that the shock value depended disproportionately on presenting women's bodies as decorative objects.
The daily editorial is currently unavailable. There’s still an entire archive to explore.