In 2011, documents released through WikiLeaks revealed that Hanesbrands had previously lobbied the U.S. State Department against raising Haiti's statutory minimum wage from $0.31 to $0.61 per hour. The episode exposed the stark economics behind mass-market underwear and apparel: a proposed increase of just thirty cents an hour became a geopolitical issue involving one of America's largest clothing manufacturers and U.S. diplomatic officials. Although the lobbying did not itself prove that Hanesbrands directly operated abusive factories, it demonstrated how major apparel companies could use government channels to resist wage increases in one of the world's poorest garment-producing countries. The disclosure intensified criticism of post-earthquake Haiti's export-manufacturing model, in which international brands benefited from extremely low labor costs while workers and labor advocates argued that wages were insufficient for basic survival. The controversy became part of the broader debate over corporate influence, U.S.-backed garment zones, and whether 'ethical sourcing' programs could be credible when brands opposed even modest statutory wage increases.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 2010s
The 2011 WikiLeaks Revelation: Hanesbrands and Haiti's 31-Cent Wage Battle
Hanesbrands Inc. / 2010s
In 2011, documents released through WikiLeaks revealed that Hanesbrands had previously lobbied the U.S. State Department against raising Haiti's statutory minimum wage from $0.31 to $0.61 per hour. The episode exposed the stark economics behind mass-market underwear and apparel: a proposed increase of just thirty cents an hour became a geopolitical issue involving one of America's largest clothing manufacturers and U.S. diplomatic officials. Although the lobbying did not itself prove that Hanesbrands directly operated abusive factories, it demonstrated how major apparel companies could use government channels to resist wage increases in one of the world's poorest garment-producing countries. The disclosure intensified criticism of post-earthquake Haiti's export-manufacturing model, in which international brands benefited from extremely low labor costs while workers and labor advocates argued that wages were insufficient for basic survival. The controversy became part of the broader debate over corporate influence, U.S.-backed garment zones, and whether 'ethical sourcing' programs could be credible when brands opposed even modest statutory wage increases.
The daily editorial is currently unavailable. There’s still an entire archive to explore.
