American Apparel's advertising celebrated unretouched bodies and often featured young people personally selected by Charney from local hangouts, but the company's intimate, founder-centered culture repeatedly collided with allegations of sexual misconduct. Charney faced at least five lawsuits beginning in the mid-2000s involving claims of sexual harassment, sexual assault, racist remarks, and abusive behavior; some accusers were described as employees as young as 17. In 2004, Jane magazine writer Claudine Ko published an account saying that Charney masturbated in front of her during an interview, an incident that generated intense publicity around both the founder and the brand. Ko later said her encounter had been misconstrued and questioned whether she had been exploited, emphasizing that the episode had produced publicity for American Apparel and a major story for her. Charney denied the broader allegations, accused plaintiffs' lawyers of extortion, and repeatedly said he saw no problem with sexually pursuing employees. The legal fallout was complicated by company documents requiring workers to waive or restrict legal claims and submit disputes to mandatory internal arbitration, which caused some cases to leave the public court system. Thus, the scandal remained a mixture of public allegations, contested accounts, confidential proceedings, and corporate consequences rather than a single criminal conviction. The accusations nevertheless became central to the 2014 boardroom revolt that removed Charney and permanently altered how American Apparel's supposedly candid, anti-airbrushing image was understood.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 2000s
The American Apparel Lawsuits and the Founder Who Claimed Sexual Pursuit Was Part of the Job
Dov Charney / American Apparel / 2000s
American Apparel's advertising celebrated unretouched bodies and often featured young people personally selected by Charney from local hangouts, but the company's intimate, founder-centered culture repeatedly collided with allegations of sexual misconduct. Charney faced at least five lawsuits beginning in the mid-2000s involving claims of sexual harassment, sexual assault, racist remarks, and abusive behavior; some accusers were described as employees as young as 17. In 2004, Jane magazine writer Claudine Ko published an account saying that Charney masturbated in front of her during an interview, an incident that generated intense publicity around both the founder and the brand. Ko later said her encounter had been misconstrued and questioned whether she had been exploited, emphasizing that the episode had produced publicity for American Apparel and a major story for her. Charney denied the broader allegations, accused plaintiffs' lawyers of extortion, and repeatedly said he saw no problem with sexually pursuing employees. The legal fallout was complicated by company documents requiring workers to waive or restrict legal claims and submit disputes to mandatory internal arbitration, which caused some cases to leave the public court system. Thus, the scandal remained a mixture of public allegations, contested accounts, confidential proceedings, and corporate consequences rather than a single criminal conviction. The accusations nevertheless became central to the 2014 boardroom revolt that removed Charney and permanently altered how American Apparel's supposedly candid, anti-airbrushing image was understood.
The daily editorial is currently unavailable. There’s still an entire archive to explore.