During the Nazi era, Carl Birkenstock joined the NSDAP in 1940 while continuing to run the family’s orthopaedic-insole business. The company had attempted to cultivate official interest earlier in the decade: Birkenstock products were pitched to the Hitler Youth, tested on SS members, and sold to individual soldiers. In 1943, Carl unsuccessfully attempted to enlist in the Sturmabteilung, the Nazi paramilitary organization. Six owners of the Steinhude company were drafted into the Wehrmacht, further entangling the business’s personnel with the wartime state. The historical record nevertheless draws an important boundary around these associations: there is no evidence that Birkenstock held supply contracts with the Wehrmacht, Nazi Party, or its organizations; no documented connection to the shoe-testing facility at Sachsenhausen concentration camp; and no record that the firm participated in the ‘Aryanization’ of Jewish property. The episode remains a morally troubling example of a German industrial family navigating—and attempting to benefit from—the Nazi political system, even though the available evidence does not establish the company as a major state supplier or confiscator of Jewish businesses.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 1940s
Carl Birkenstock’s Nazi Party Membership and Failed Bid for Military Patronage
Carl Birkenstock and Gebr. Birkenstock GmbH / 1940s
During the Nazi era, Carl Birkenstock joined the NSDAP in 1940 while continuing to run the family’s orthopaedic-insole business. The company had attempted to cultivate official interest earlier in the decade: Birkenstock products were pitched to the Hitler Youth, tested on SS members, and sold to individual soldiers. In 1943, Carl unsuccessfully attempted to enlist in the Sturmabteilung, the Nazi paramilitary organization. Six owners of the Steinhude company were drafted into the Wehrmacht, further entangling the business’s personnel with the wartime state. The historical record nevertheless draws an important boundary around these associations: there is no evidence that Birkenstock held supply contracts with the Wehrmacht, Nazi Party, or its organizations; no documented connection to the shoe-testing facility at Sachsenhausen concentration camp; and no record that the firm participated in the ‘Aryanization’ of Jewish property. The episode remains a morally troubling example of a German industrial family navigating—and attempting to benefit from—the Nazi political system, even though the available evidence does not establish the company as a major state supplier or confiscator of Jewish businesses.
The daily editorial is currently unavailable. There’s still an entire archive to explore.
