Sweatshop labor did not disappear when apparel production moved overseas. In 2016, the United States Department of Labor investigated 77 Los Angeles garment factories producing clothing for major brands and found labor violations in 85 percent of the factories visited. The figure revealed how a city associated with celebrity fashion and enormous retail consumption still contained a hidden manufacturing economy where workers could be exposed to wage theft, unlawful pay practices, and inadequate protections. The investigations followed a longer history of federal intervention: between 1993 and 1997, the Department of Labor recovered $12.5 million in back wages for more than 40,000 workers. Together, the cases demonstrated that the sweatshop model was not merely an overseas problem. It could survive inside a wealthy country by operating through subcontracting networks that obscured who controlled production and who owed workers their wages.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 2010s
The 2016 Los Angeles Garment Investigation: Wage Violations Inside America’s Fast-Fashion Supply Chain
Los Angeles garment factories supplying major apparel brands / 2010s
Sweatshop labor did not disappear when apparel production moved overseas. In 2016, the United States Department of Labor investigated 77 Los Angeles garment factories producing clothing for major brands and found labor violations in 85 percent of the factories visited. The figure revealed how a city associated with celebrity fashion and enormous retail consumption still contained a hidden manufacturing economy where workers could be exposed to wage theft, unlawful pay practices, and inadequate protections. The investigations followed a longer history of federal intervention: between 1993 and 1997, the Department of Labor recovered $12.5 million in back wages for more than 40,000 workers. Together, the cases demonstrated that the sweatshop model was not merely an overseas problem. It could survive inside a wealthy country by operating through subcontracting networks that obscured who controlled production and who owed workers their wages.
The daily editorial is currently unavailable. There’s still an entire archive to explore.
