As Brown Shoe mechanized production in the early twentieth century, jobs that had once required highly skilled shoemaking increasingly became low-paid factory positions that could be filled by women and children. A 1911 survey of St. Louis shoe workers found that more than half were between fourteen and nineteen years old; girls under sixteen earned, on average, less than $10 a week. Brown and its competitors maintained margins by suppressing labor costs while machinery and materials remained relatively fixed expenses. Workers responded by organizing, first through the more moderate Boot and Shoe Workers Union and later through the more militant United Shoe Workers of America, which was associated with the Industrial Workers of the World. Brown increasingly shifted production away from unionized St. Louis and into smaller towns in Missouri and Illinois, where local governments offered tax subsidies and management could obtain cheaper, less organized labor. The strategy foreshadowed the familiar twentieth-century pattern of relocating manufacturing to jurisdictions where workers had less bargaining power.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 1910s
Brown Shoe's Child-Paid Workforce and the Flight to Subsidized Small-Town Factories
Brown Shoe Company / 1910s
As Brown Shoe mechanized production in the early twentieth century, jobs that had once required highly skilled shoemaking increasingly became low-paid factory positions that could be filled by women and children. A 1911 survey of St. Louis shoe workers found that more than half were between fourteen and nineteen years old; girls under sixteen earned, on average, less than $10 a week. Brown and its competitors maintained margins by suppressing labor costs while machinery and materials remained relatively fixed expenses. Workers responded by organizing, first through the more moderate Boot and Shoe Workers Union and later through the more militant United Shoe Workers of America, which was associated with the Industrial Workers of the World. Brown increasingly shifted production away from unionized St. Louis and into smaller towns in Missouri and Illinois, where local governments offered tax subsidies and management could obtain cheaper, less organized labor. The strategy foreshadowed the familiar twentieth-century pattern of relocating manufacturing to jurisdictions where workers had less bargaining power.
The daily editorial is currently unavailable. There’s still an entire archive to explore.
