On January 16, 2019, Sterling Jewelers agreed to pay $11 million to settle an investigation by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The Bureau concluded that the jewelry retailer had enrolled customers in store-credit accounts without their knowledge or consent and had added payment-protection insurance. Investigators also found alleged violations of the Truth in Lending Act, including customers being signed up for credit-card accounts without first receiving an application. Signet Jewelers disputed the allegations but accepted the settlement, creating a second major corporate scandal for the owner of Kay and Jared within the same decade. The case exposed how high-pressure jewelry sales could extend beyond the product itself, potentially placing customers into undisclosed financial obligations and insurance arrangements at the point of purchase.
Preparing the daily feature…
AI concept artworkArchive Record · 2010s
The Store-Credit Enrollment Scheme That Cost Sterling $11 Million
Sterling Jewelers and Signet Jewelers / 2010s
On January 16, 2019, Sterling Jewelers agreed to pay $11 million to settle an investigation by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The Bureau concluded that the jewelry retailer had enrolled customers in store-credit accounts without their knowledge or consent and had added payment-protection insurance. Investigators also found alleged violations of the Truth in Lending Act, including customers being signed up for credit-card accounts without first receiving an application. Signet Jewelers disputed the allegations but accepted the settlement, creating a second major corporate scandal for the owner of Kay and Jared within the same decade. The case exposed how high-pressure jewelry sales could extend beyond the product itself, potentially placing customers into undisclosed financial obligations and insurance arrangements at the point of purchase.
The daily editorial is currently unavailable. There’s still an entire archive to explore.
